subject:"\[Bug middle\-end\/48124\] \[4.5\/4.6\/4.7 Regression\] likely wrong code bug"

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-06-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #30 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-04 08:43:32 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 4 08:43:23 2012 New Revision: 188167 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188167 Log: 2012-06-04 Richard Guenther Eric Botca

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-06-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #29 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-03 08:22:01 UTC --- > I have now successfully tested it on i586-suse-linux-gnu, > powerpc-suse-linux-gnu and powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu. It looks OK on x86/x86-64/PowerPC/SPARC/SPARC64 on my side.

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-06-01 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-01 10:20:09 UTC --- On Wed, 30 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > --- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-30 > 15:28:1

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-05-31 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-31 10:48:19 UTC --- On Thu, 31 May 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-31 > 10:42:10 UT

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-31 10:42:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > On Thu, 31 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > > > --- Comment #24 from Eric Botcaz

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-05-31 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-31 10:36:10 UTC --- > I'll test it on i?85-linux as well. I don't have access to a > strict-alignment platform - but the patch is essentially the same > as on trunk. Can you give it a shot on sparc or

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-05-31 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-31 10:36:10 UTC --- > I'll test it on i?85-linux as well. I don't have access to a > strict-alignment platform - but the patch is essentially the same > as on trunk. Can you give it a shot on sparc or

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-05-31 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-31 08:41:00 UTC --- On Wed, 30 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > --- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-30 > 15:28:1

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-05-30 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-30 15:28:14 UTC --- > Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. This also needs to be tested on 32-bit and strict-alignment platforms.