[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #16 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-06 20:30:13 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jul 6 20:30:06 2011 New Revision: 175933 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175933 Log: Use pointer_mode for address computation.

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-06 13:19:08 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jul 6 13:19:04 2011 New Revision: 175912 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175912 Log: Use pointer_mode for address computation.

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-12 17:37:49 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Feb 12 17:37:46 2011 New Revision: 170081 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170081 Log: Use ptr_mode instead of targetm.addr_space.

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-12 17:36:47 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Feb 12 17:36:45 2011 New Revision: 170080 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170080 Log: Support 32bit address in x32 mode. 2011-02

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09 17:20:07 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Feb 9 17:20:00 2011 New Revision: 169979 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169979 Log: Disable ivopts for non-constant base with n

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-04 04:12:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > > looks wrong since it assumes D.2750_34 can be negative. But > > sizetype values are sign-extended. > ivopts uses unsigned on purpose and create_mem_ref isn't

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-21 12:38:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T > On Jan 20, 2011 21:34, hjl.tools at gmail dot com > wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2011-01-21 11:43:45 UTC --- Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T On Jan 20, 2011 21:34, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 ---

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-21 05:52:47 UTC --- Should ivopts use signed integer instead of unsigned integer for index type if it is known to be negative?

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-21 05:33:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > The ivopts pass transforms > > > unsigned int D.2715; > unsigned int D.2716; > ... > D.2715_43 = (unsigned int) elems_3(D); > D.2716_42 = D.2715_43 + 429

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end Summary|[x32] Incorrect a