[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 --- Comment #12 from Dave Korn 2010-12-19 11:14:23 UTC --- Author: davek Date: Sun Dec 19 11:14:19 2010 New Revision: 168047 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168047 Log: PR middle-end/46674 PR middle-end/46221 *

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 --- Comment #11 from Dave Korn 2010-12-15 16:17:54 UTC --- Created attachment 22765 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22765 Lower all C identifiers to actual assembler symbols for comparison. This should resolve the problem by

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 --- Comment #10 from Dave Korn 2010-12-10 14:29:03 UTC --- Author: davek Date: Fri Dec 10 14:28:58 2010 New Revision: 167688 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167688 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR middle-end/46674 PR lto/431

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 --- Comment #7 from Jie Zhang 2010-12-02 04:10:04 UTC --- Author: jiez Date: Thu Dec 2 04:09:58 2010 New Revision: 167365 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167365 Log: PR middle-end/46674 * varasm.c (compute_visible_

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 --- Comment #6 from Jie Zhang 2010-11-30 23:58:54 UTC --- The patch for review: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg02973.html

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 --- Comment #5 from Jie Zhang 2010-11-30 11:17:47 UTC --- Created attachment 22577 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22577 The patch I'm testing this patch.

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 --- Comment #4 from Jie Zhang 2010-11-30 10:00:05 UTC --- Hah, I now know the root cause. It's "*__GI_memchr" that is added into the visible point set since it's a user provided name. But GCC looks for "__GI_memchr" later, which is not the same i

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 --- Comment #3 from Jie Zhang 2010-11-29 10:56:37 UTC --- If I revert this change, this bug will disappear. @@ -416,7 +415,7 @@ cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes (bool be found = true; /* If so, we need to keep node in the callg

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 Jie Zhang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR