subject:"\[Bug middle\-end\/46423\] \[4.6 Regression\] FAIL\: g\+\+.dg\/torture\/pr34850.C"

[Bug middle-end/46423] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

2010-11-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-15 12:39:04 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 15 12:38:59 2010 New Revision: 166752 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166752 Log: 2010-11-15 Richard Guenther PR testsui

[Bug middle-end/46423] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

2010-11-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46423] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

2010-11-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug middle-end/46423] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

2010-11-11 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-11-11 18:43:39 UTC --- On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 > > > > --- Co

[Bug middle-end/46423] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

2010-11-11 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-11-11 18:42:53 UTC --- On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 > > --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-11 > 17:47:47 UTC --

[Bug middle-end/46423] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

2010-11-11 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-11 17:47:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ok, the catch is that they seem to be target specific now. Is there way to > say to ignore > warning if it appears? dg-prune-output perhaps?

[Bug middle-end/46423] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

2010-11-11 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-11 14:57:57 UTC --- > --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-11 > 14:22:23 UTC --- > The testcase is supposed to not ICE or hang, the diagnostics indeed come > and go, so it's fine to expect them ag

[Bug middle-end/46423] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

2010-11-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-11 14:22:23 UTC --- The testcase is supposed to not ICE or hang, the diagnostics indeed come and go, so it's fine to expect them again. See svn log which tells you that martin removed them last time .