http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554
--- Comment #19 from Ian Bolton 2011-01-28
11:30:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > gcc 4.4.5 was released in October. Please can you confirm if this is now
> > fixed.
>
> I think THIS bug is fixed in 4.4.5. Un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554
Christian Eggers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554
--- Comment #15 from Christian Eggers
2010-09-28 11:01:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Created attachment 21901 [details]
> A patch that should fix it
>
> Please verify whether this fixes it.
Hasn't it already been fixed in comment #11?
--- Comment #13 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 13:58
---
Subject: Bug 44554
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Sep 9 13:58:24 2010
New Revision: 164107
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164107
Log:
2010-09-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/445
--- Comment #12 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 13:56
---
Subject: Bug 44554
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Sep 9 13:55:35 2010
New Revision: 164105
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164105
Log:
2010-09-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/445
--- Comment #11 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 13:54
---
Subject: Bug 44554
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Sep 9 13:53:32 2010
New Revision: 164102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164102
Log:
2010-09-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/445
--- Comment #10 from christian dot eggers at kathrein dot de 2010-09-09
06:17 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I've submitted a patch solving PR40386. So now we can solve this problem by
> preventing slot sharing when setjmp is used.
>
> I'll send a patch soon.
Could you please send me
--- Comment #9 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 20:06 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Is this still a bug then? Should ira-share-spill-slots be automatically
> > disabled for the caller function when a callee function can return twice?
> >
> I've n
--- Comment #8 from christian dot eggers at kathrein dot de 2010-09-08
11:12 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Is this still a bug then? Should ira-share-spill-slots be automatically
> disabled for the caller function when a callee function can return twice?
>
I've never tested with gcc-
--- Comment #7 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 08:49 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Do we need to act as if
> > -fno-ira-share-spill-slots
> > is set in cfun->calls_setjmp functions?
>
> At least in my case "-Os -fno-ira-share-spill-slots" see
--- Comment #6 from ceggers at gmx dot de 2010-06-17 18:56 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Do we need to act as if
> -fno-ira-share-spill-slots
> is set in cfun->calls_setjmp functions?
At least in my case "-Os -fno-ira-share-spill-slots" seems to solve the
problem. This applies also to
13 matches
Mail list logo
