http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2010-11-22 19:58:56 UTC ---
*** Bug 43316 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-22 18:03:05 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Nov 22 18:02:58 2010
New Revision: 167042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167042
Log:
PR middle-end/43057
* fold-const.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-22 16:14:33 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Nov 22 16:14:27 2010
New Revision: 167037
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167037
Log:
PR middle-end/43057
* fold-const.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.5.2, 4.6.0
--- Comment #5 from Dmitr
--- Comment #4 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-03-10
00:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=20071)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20071&action=view)
Another testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057
--- Comment #3 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-02-27 14:02 ---
Testcase fails when compiled as C++ code too (without -flto):
$ /mnt/sdb1/build-157106-checking-fold/gcc/cc1plus -O bug.c
int main()
Analyzing compilation unit
Performing interprocedural optimizations
<*free_lang_data>