--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-15 16:21 ---
With a patch to solve an ICE triggered by this testcase (to be
committed soon with a reduced testcase to the graphite branch),
I am seeing these numbers on the graphite branch:
./f951 -O2 ~/ex/graphite/pr41193.f90
Gr
--- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-09-18 15:18 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If possible please update the performance numbers with recent trunk.
much faster now at -O1 ;-)
fortran -fgraphite -c -O1 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize
-march=native -ftime-repo
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-18 09:06 ---
If possible please update the performance numbers with recent trunk.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-31 10:50 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> On the 4.4 branch with -fgraphite?
yes, that is correct, i.e. with the 4.4 branch the
gfortran -fgraphite -c -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize
-march=native -ftime-report tmp
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 10:12 ---
On the 4.4 branch with -fgraphite? Or are you complaining about the 4s vs. 8s
without -fgraphite? In which case the bug summary is misleading (also you
didn't build trunk with --enable-checking=release, so that num
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-31 07:37 ---
Compile time is about 4s with the 4.4 branch, so I'll mark it as a regression.
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
