--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 20:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=18345)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18345&action=view)
patch
Fix I am testing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41047
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 18:54 ---
We used to get
memcpy (&c, &"12345678"[2], 6); [tail call]
memcpy (&c, "123456", 6); [tail call]
for expansion, but now we get
D.2386_1 = (const void * restrict) "123456";
c.1_2 = (void * restrict) &c;
m
--- Comment #2 from anemet at caviumnetworks dot com 2009-08-12 18:08
---
Subject: gcc.target/mips/memcpy-1.c failing
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Is that a recent regression?
Last 12 days. Guerby has results from 7/30 that don't show this.
Adam
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 17:54 ---
Is that a recent regression?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41047
