--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-21 00:22 ---
I didn't call it a bug or a regression, but even a deliberate change can
produce incompatibilities between objects compiled with different versions of
GCC. That's why it would be good to get a suppressible warning/not
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-21 00:02 ---
Also see the thread starting at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg00994.html .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39514
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-21 00:01 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00686.html
In fact I think the trunk is more correct at least that is the way I read the
sizes and offsets.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39514
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-20 23:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=17505)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17505&action=view)
partial patch to compiler, good patch to testsuite
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39514
