--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-27 00:00 ---
The fortran front-end needs to be able to tell the middle-end that the function
cannot be recursive and then the middle-end needs to use that info.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-02-25 13:37 ---
Subject: Re: Optimize away only set but not used variable
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 25, 2009, at 1:43 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org"
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-0
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 25, 2009, at 1:43 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-25
09:43 ---
Is there a reason the Fortran frontend gives function local
variables static
storage duration?
Yes, it is larg
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-25 11:21 ---
Optimizing dead local static variables requires special handling which probably
is not thought to be worth the trouble. If the variable is unused the
programmer can as well remove it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-25 10:35 ---
I did some testing with sunf95, icc and ifort.
sunf95 also puts the variable in .bss as gfortran does, while ifort puts it on
the stack (unless explicitly declared as static ["SAVE"]). If the variable is
static, neit
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-25 10:21 ---
> Is there a reason the Fortran frontend gives function local variables static
> storage duration?
For huge arrays, there is a problem if the memory is allocated on the stack, as
one quickly hits stack-size limits. T
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-25 09:51 ---
It works with it == 1024 in which case foo is not static.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39298
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-25 09:43 ---
Is there a reason the Fortran frontend gives function local variables static
storage duration?
a ()
{
struct __st_parameter_dt dt_parm.1;
static integer(kind=4) options.0[8] = {68, 255, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1};
stat
