--- Comment #21 from nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-21 17:48 ---
Fixed.
--
nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #20 from nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-21 17:48 ---
Subject: Bug 37669
Author: nemet
Date: Tue Oct 21 17:46:53 2008
New Revision: 141270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141270
Log:
PR middle-end/37669
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (ccp_fold_b
--- Comment #19 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 14:02 ---
As arg_mask is only 1, 2 or 4, the fix could be e.g. just break at the end of
if ((arg_mask >> i) & 1) body, or changing the for condition to i < nargs && i
<= 31. But if the former, we might as well turn arg_mask in
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 09:40
---
Heh, nobody ever will need more than 32 parameters!
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #17 from nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 04:21 ---
I'm testing a patch.
--
nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedT
--- Comment #16 from nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 03:54 ---
I'm seeing this with mips64octeon-linux-gnu as well.
I think the problem is that in
ccp_fold_builtin():
2502memset (val, 0, sizeof (val));
2503for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
2504 {
2505i
--- Comment #15 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-13 09:00 ---
gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37669.c fails also on i686-apple-darwin9 in 32 and 64
bit modes (as far as I can tell, it never passed).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37669
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 02:06
---
This still fails after the patch to fix PR 37535 on i386-darwin8.11.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37669
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-05 19:44
---
ira-merge branch is OK for i586-pc-linux-gnu:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-10/msg00316.html
It has this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg01955.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-10-04 21:47 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Must be darwin specific then, can't reproduce on x86_64-linux and from quick
> skim of gcc-testresults nobody else that supplied test summary recently
> managed
> to reproduced it.
i586-pc-li
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 16:26
---
>Must be darwin specific then, can't reproduce on x86_64-linux
Has anyone tried bootstrapping on i686-linux-gnu with PIC enabled lately? This
might show the same issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 09:26 ---
Must be darwin specific then, can't reproduce on x86_64-linux and from quick
skim of gcc-testresults nobody else that supplied test summary recently managed
to reproduced it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 01:41 ---
Actually my reduced testcase still fails for me on the trunk as of
Mon Sep 29 21:29:02 UTC 2008 (revision 140765)
Stage1's gcc is still fine.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Rem
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 21:25 ---
Subject: Bug 37669
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Sep 29 21:23:52 2008
New Revision: 140765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140765
Log:
2008-09-29 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 21:24 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 21:12 ---
It fails with "GNU C (GCC) version 4.4.0 20080926 (experimental) [trunk
revision 140710] (i386-apple-darwin8.11.1)" But not with a stage1 compiler so
...
I am going to add this testcase so we don't get the wrong cod
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 21:10 ---
Hmm, maybe this was one of the miscompiling that is happening with IRA ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37669
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 13:23 ---
Can't reproduce with current SVN, neither the reduced nor original testcase, on
x86_64, i?86, ppc and ppc64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37669
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-28 19:29 ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
extern __inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) int __attribute__
((__nothrow__)) snprintf (char *__restrict __s, size_t __n, __const char
*__restrict __fmt, ..
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
20 matches
Mail list logo
