[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2012-10-26 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2012-10-26 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 --- Comment #48 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-26 16:48:08 UTC --- The problem here is walking of callgraph edges to sum the code size of the caller function in both early inliner and late inliner. I am still not very keen on making the cost cal

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2012-10-26 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 --- Comment #47 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-26 15:22:50 UTC --- Hmm, good timming. I just started looking into re-tunning inliner heuristics for 4.8 so I should look again into this inline bomb... Looks like inliner did not get faster ;)

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2012-10-25 Thread lucier at math dot purdue.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 --- Comment #46 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2012-10-26 02:05:13 UTC --- Created attachment 28534 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28534 memory and time statistics for compiling lgwam.c With today's mainline le

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2012-10-25 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 --- Comment #45 from Steven Bosscher 2012-10-25 23:51:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > We seem to make nice progress on the testcase ;) I wonder where things stand with trunk today..

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2011-01-18 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 --- Comment #44 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-18 14:58:04 UTC --- and later IRA samples %app name symbol name 2582656.8667 cc1 allocno_spill_priority_compare 6812 14.9994 cc1

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2011-01-18 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 --- Comment #43 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-18 14:53:46 UTC --- Now at -O2 the main inliner seems to degenerate ;( 168767 78.4974 cc1 cgraph_edge_badness 9426 4.3842 cc1 update_edge_key 3529 1.

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2011-01-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||47344 Target Milestone|4.3.6

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2008-09-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 08:02 --- It indeed uses about 1.4GB ram and takes 26s (I think that's reasonable) to build the testcase. It's the DF initialize pass that requires this much memory. The function in question has 31671 basic blocks. dfinish

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2008-09-10 Thread grue at diku dot dk
--- Comment #2 from grue at diku dot dk 2008-09-10 08:01 --- Created an attachment (id=16282) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16282&action=view) The statistics mentioned in the bug description -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448

[Bug middle-end/37448] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2008-09-10 Thread grue at diku dot dk
--- Comment #1 from grue at diku dot dk 2008-09-10 08:01 --- Created an attachment (id=16281) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16281&action=view) The source mentioned in the bug description -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448