[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-10-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 09:12 --- *** Bug 35874 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-10-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 09:11 --- *** Bug 37666 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-10-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-01 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 37285 Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 1 15:09:26 2008 New Revision: 140814 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140814 Log: 2008-10-01 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-10-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-01 15:09 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-10-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-10-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-01 13:20 --- Note that after tuples we always have a default label again, just the default label isn't a default label. I have a patch to fix that, sort of Index: tree-vrp.c =

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-09-09 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37285

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-08-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 11:59 --- The code in purge_dead_edges looks broken. /* If we don't see a jump insn, we don't know exactly why the block would have been broken at this point. Look for a simple, non-fallthru edge, as these are on

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-08-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-30 22:27 --- One more thing I forgot to mention is that the ICE is during expand time. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37285

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-08-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-30 22:17 --- ../../src/bfd/xcofflink.c: In function '_bfd_xcoff_canonicalize_dynamic_reloc': ../../src/bfd/xcofflink.c:399: internal compiler error: in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2327 Please submit a full bug report, with prep

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-08-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-30 14:10 --- What is the ICE? and with what options? I get the same IL on i?86 but no ICE. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

2008-08-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http: