http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35308
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35308
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.1 |4.9.0
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.8.1
--- Comment #4 from Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35308
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Keywords|
--- Comment #2 from xinliangli at gmail dot com 2008-02-23 06:55 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Sometimes doing the strength reduction actually increases the code size.
> Think
> on targets which have auto increments.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22586 ***
>
It
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-23 05:27 ---
Sometimes doing the strength reduction actually increases the code size. Think
on targets which have auto increments.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22586 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org c
