--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-26 14:29 ---
This is correct, return z is an access. I don't see why you would think
otherwise.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-29 10:33 ---
Yes, I also think 'return z' is a load from z which cannot be optimized away.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34282
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-29 10:29 ---
I think "return z" is an access.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34282
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-29 07:13
---
> IMO, there is no need for (1), since we already have correct value in %eax.
> However, even when value lives in another register, we should load it into
> the return register from the reg, not from mem location.
