--- Comment #8 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 02:06 ---
> You tested against version 129192 and i checked in the corrected patch as
> 129193.
Oh, my tester had fallen into that narrow pitfall :-)
I've confirmed that the errors go away with the current trunk.
Thanks both
--- Comment #7 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-11 21:50
---
kazumoto,
there was a set of miscommunications associated with the final patch for
pr33669.
hj had checked in an earlier version of the patch and that testcase and i asked
him to revert it because there were iss
--- Comment #6 from spark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-11 03:07 ---
Never mind. I should pay attention to 1 vs l :(
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33662
--- Comment #5 from spark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-11 00:51 ---
What configure option should I use to enable -m1 option support ?
Looks like plain-vanilla configured sh4-elf compiler doesn't support -m1 flag.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33662
--- Comment #4 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-10 13:33
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Wrong register allocation
on SH
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 13:28
> ---
> Not fixed by r129192.
--- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 13:28 ---
Not fixed by r129192. I see
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr33669.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr33669.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr33669.c execution, -Os
on sh4-unknown-linux-gn
--- Comment #2 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-08 03:53
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33669 ***
--
zadeck at naturalbridge dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-08 02:22 ---
I've confirmed that the patch in the trail of pr33669 fixes this too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33662
