--- Comment #5 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 15:23 ---
I am beginning to enjoy this:
There are about 34 hours between the first indication of failure on regress an
my report. There are about 8 hours between my report and the first
acknowledgment by GCC. This came by maste
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 13:50 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap check failures ICE's
On 2 Sep 2007 13:42:42 -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-
On 2 Sep 2007 13:42:42 -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-02 13:42
> ---
> > [18:23] < apinski> between 127935 and 128000
>
> Fromp http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/, looking at the results f
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-02 13:42 ---
> [18:23] < apinski> between 127935 and 128000
Fromp http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/, looking at the results from
"regress", it can be narrowed between 127961 (working) and 127997 (non
working). Note that the
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 11:41 ---
[18:22] < apinski>
/home/apinski/src/local/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c:5:
error: could not split insn^M
[18:22] < apinski> new failure
[18:23] < apinski> on ppc-linux-gnu
[18:23] < apinski> be
