--- Comment #9 from zackw at panix dot com 2007-07-06 17:59 ---
Ian Taylor and I found a simpler patch that does not use langhooks, and also
has the virtue of working. ;-) Committed as rev 126424.
--
zackw at panix dot com changed:
What|Removed |A
--- Comment #8 from zackw at panix dot com 2007-07-06 17:58 ---
Subject: Bug 32441
Author: zack
Date: Fri Jul 6 17:57:58 2007
New Revision: 126424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126424
Log:
2007-07-06 Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Zack Weinb
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-06 13:44 ---
Even if this IR is created at expansion time?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32441
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-29 18:52
---
There is nothing wrong with langhooks per se.
The problem is langhooks that influence the interpretation of the IR, not
langhooks that are used to *create* the IR.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
