[Bug middle-end/31980] ICE in cancel_option() for Negative marked options

2024-10-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31980 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/31980] ICE in cancel_option() for Negative marked options

2010-07-18 Thread John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net
--- Comment #4 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2010-07-18 17:13 --- Created an attachment (id=21241) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21241&action=view) Fix ICE in cancel_option() by repreventing a recursive call for Negative marked option -- http://gcc.gnu.

[Bug middle-end/31980] ICE in cancel_option() for Negative marked options

2010-07-18 Thread John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net
--- Comment #3 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2010-07-18 17:11 --- I'm updating my port for 4.6trunk and this gcc problem is still there. My suggested patch in comment #1 is still applicable and attached it after having brought up-to-date for trunk. ChangeLog: John Tytgat *

[Bug middle-end/31980] ICE in cancel_option()

2010-02-20 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 23:02 --- Is this solved? Anyway, this does not seem to be a bug in GCC. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/31980] ICE in cancel_option()

2007-05-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-17 20:48 --- I don't think you want the options to be in the MASK anyways. Use Var(a, 0) Var(a, 1) Var(a, 2) etc. instead and that should fix your ICE. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed