--- Comment #13 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 15:55 ---
Done.
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-06 16:11 ---
Subject: Bug 30447
Author: ghazi
Date: Sun Dec 6 16:11:06 2009
New Revision: 155023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155023
Log:
PR middle-end/30447
PR middle-end/30789
--- Comment #11 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-14 06:15 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > except for cproj because that has a wierd non-c99 implementation in glibc.
>
> I don't see why one particular library having a bug in its implementation
> of cproj should prevent GCC fro
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-10-14 02:27
---
Subject: Re: Evaluate complex math functions at
compile-time
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Support for the "arc" functions is done in the mpc svn repository which will
> be
> relea
--- Comment #9 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-14 01:57 ---
Support for the "arc" functions is done in the mpc svn repository which will be
released as mpc-0.8 at the end of October. Use of these functions has been
checked into mainline. All C99 builtin complex math functions
--- Comment #8 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-20 16:21 ---
Current GCC mainline incorporates all the complex math functions included with
mpc-0.7. All that's left are the complex "arc" functions which are expected in
a future MPC release, possibly mpc-0.8.
--
ghazi at gcc
--- Comment #7 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-11 15:55 ---
Patches to integrate the MPC library posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00671.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00672.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00673.html
--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-25 04:15 ---
Subject: Bug 30447
Author: ghazi
Date: Thu Jan 25 04:15:26 2007
New Revision: 121163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121163
Log:
PR middle-end/30447
* builtins.c (fold_builtin_ca
--- Comment #5 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 14:45 ---
Patch for __complex__ builtins infrastructure and csin posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01610.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30447
--- Comment #4 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-01-13 06:09 ---
Subject: Re: Evaluate complex math functions at compile-time
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 05:17:11AM -, ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #3 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 05:17 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > We can implement the complex variants in term of the real ones in mpfr, no?
> > I
> > don't like the idea of another build-dependency ;)
> >
> Yes, you can. g
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-12 19:12 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> We can implement the complex variants in term of the real ones in mpfr, no? I
> don't like the idea of another build-dependency ;)
>
Yes, you can. gfortran does this already for several F
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-12 19:02 ---
We can implement the complex variants in term of the real ones in mpfr, no? I
don't like the idea of another build-dependency ;)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reco
14 matches
Mail list logo
