--- Comment #19 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-17 09:33 ---
If the question was more general, not just about this particular PR (yeah, I
know I have over 35 PRs still open for 4.2 and/or 4.1 that have been fixed
already on the turnk), yes, there is some chance, but ATM I'm swa
--- Comment #18 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-17 09:28 ---
Given that this patch introduced a regression (which has since been fixed), I'd
try to be very careful. As it is just a missed-optimization, I think I'd feel
safer to only fix this on the trunk.
--
http://gcc.gn
--- Comment #17 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-12-17 09:24 ---
Jakub, is there any chance of backporting your patch(es) to 4.2?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29749
--- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-03 22:45 ---
Fixed on the trunk.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary
