--- Comment #11 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 20:57 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' in .o causes segv of ld.
Thanks for looking at it. Uli Drepper helped me to look at the asm and
conclude (just about one hour ago) that indeed the problem is with
"as". It clea
--- Comment #10 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 20:49 ---
FYI, the testcase does not build with my system g++ 4.1.2; remove the "static"
from 'extern "C" static'. The result does not choke my system's binutils, i.e.
it links successfully.
If I use the provided .s file inste
--- Comment #9 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:51 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' in .o causes segv of ld.
Fair enough. I did report it to them, but never heard back. Uli
Drepper is going to try to help me get to the right people. He has
also offered to look
--- Comment #8 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:48 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' in .o causes segv of ld.
One last comment. From the below, I think it is clear that the
compiler is the problem. If I compile with -g then I get the problem,
however if I compil
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 18:48 ---
> If you disagree with that assertion then please tell me.
Yes I do disagree because GCC only produces a .s file which then binutils
assembles and links.
Then again you are using a GCC and binutils that were modified
