http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29274
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7
--- Comment #15 from Richard Gue
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:11
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #13 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 11:26 ---
Subject: Bug 29274
Author: bernds
Date: Thu Apr 22 11:25:44 2010
New Revision: 158642
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158642
Log:
PR middle-end/29274
* gcc.target/arm/wmul-1.c:
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 10:11
---
Fixed for 4.6.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work
--- Comment #10 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-29 23:21 ---
*** Bug 42498 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-26 18:35 ---
Note that even for
(long long)i * (long long)j * (long long)i
we can only use one mulsidi3, so promoting parts of the multiplications to
additions should be still beneficial.
I suppose we should detect widening
--- Comment #8 from froydnj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-26 15:50 ---
Even if the problems in expand are fixed, reassoc is still going to cause
problems with the original testcase. From the dse1 dump:
D.2474_14 = (long long int) vLo_11;
D.2475_15 = (long long int) c1_6;
D.2476_
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 ---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 19:46 ---
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|
