[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
--- Comment #15 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 03:02 --- (In reply to comment #13) > This is how the (relevant) thing looks like, when compiled with -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer. I removed the "static" modifier of the function, since > then it got merged within ot

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 02:55 --- I can reproduce this now after building on x86. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25636

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
--- Comment #13 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 02:51 --- This is how the (relevant) thing looks like, when compiled with -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer. I removed the "static" modifier of the function, since then it got merged within other functions and didn't get its

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
--- Comment #12 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 02:09 --- >From compilation logs, I see: -- gcc -c -g -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definit

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
--- Comment #11 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 02:02 --- OK, now, this is totally weird, because now I checked the 'stage1-cc/cc1' within the output object compilation tree and it works OK. However the higher stages 'prev-gcc/cc1' and 'gcc/cc1' fail! I also noti

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 01:50 --- Subject: Re: cc1 and cc1plus --help core On Jan 15, 2006, at 8:48 PM, drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz wrote: > > > --- Comment #9 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz > 2006-01-16 01:48 -

Re: [Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Jan 15, 2006, at 8:48 PM, drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz wrote: --- Comment #9 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 01:48 --- OK, so how about this, couldn't this be an issue? --- opts.c.old 2006-01-15 23:36:53.0 +0100 +++ opts.c 2006

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
--- Comment #9 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 01:48 --- OK, so how about this, couldn't this be an issue? --- opts.c.old 2006-01-15 23:36:53.0 +0100 +++ opts.c 2006-01-16 02:48:17.0 +0100 @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ print_filtered_help (unsigned

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 01:40 --- cl_options_count does not change. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25636

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
--- Comment #7 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 01:38 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #2) ... > So perhaps this should rather be something like: > > printed = xrealloc (printed, cl_options_count); > memset (printed, 0, cl_options_count); Or p

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
--- Comment #6 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 01:33 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x083580bd in print_filtered_help (flag=536870912) at ../.././gcc/opts.c:1301 > 1301 memset (printed, 0, cl_options

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
--- Comment #5 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 01:24 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I cannot reproduce this on either powerpc-darwin or x86_64-linux-gnu. Confirmed here, irreproducible on x86_64, but occures on plain 32-bit x86. Just in case LANG* or LC_* has t

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 00:54 --- This does make sense as printed is set right before the memset if was NULL. Can you use "make bootstrap" instead? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25636

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 00:51 --- *** Bug 25800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-06 Thread freddyz77 at tin dot it
--- Comment #2 from freddyz77 at tin dot it 2006-01-06 09:14 --- Well, I don't know why but looking more deeply I still don't understand $ gdb /opt/gcc42/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.0/cc1 GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.84rh) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is f

[Bug middle-end/25636] cc1 and cc1plus --help core

2006-01-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-02 16:44 --- I cannot reproduce this on either powerpc-darwin or x86_64-linux-gnu. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---