--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25261
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 02:51 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 18:11 ---
Subject: Bug 25261
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 26 18:10:58 2006
New Revision: 117235
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117235
Log:
PR middle-end/25261
PR middle-end/28790
*
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 15:46 ---
Furthermore, I have no idea what would:
extern void abort (void);
int
baz (int (*bar) (void))
{
return bar ();
}
void
foo (int *j)
{
int i = 5;
int (*fn) (void);
int bar (void) { return i + 1; }
fn = bar;
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 14:22 ---
I believe OMP_PARALLEL handling in tree-nested.c isn't the only problem, see
e.g.:
extern void abort (void);
void
foo (int *j)
{
int i = 5;
int bar (void) { return i + 1; }
#pragma omp sections private (i)
{
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-21 12:35 ---
It is not that hard to try the testcase. It is still broken.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 20:19 ---
Is this true any more or is it still broken.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25261
