[Bug middle-end/24716] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code generated when optimising

2005-11-09 Thread bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug middle-end/24716] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code generated when optimising

2005-11-09 Thread bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 08:20 --- Reduced testcase /* { dg-do run } */ /* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-dom3" } */ int Link[] = { -1 }; int W[] = { 2 }; extern void abort (void); int f (int k, int p) { int pdest, j, D1361; j = 0; pdest = 0;

[Bug middle-end/24716] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code generated when optimising

2005-11-08 Thread bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 17:47 --- For now, I am trying to get the size of umf_analyze down by removing the unnecessary prototypes, beautifying the code, etc... Paolo -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24716

[Bug middle-end/24716] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code generated when optimising

2005-11-08 Thread schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
--- Comment #5 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-08 15:54 --- I would like to identify the cause of this problem. Would it help if I tracked down the patch number that caused this problem? Andrew, do you have an automated system to do that, or is someone already doing it?

[Bug middle-end/24716] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code generated when optimising

2005-11-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 20:43 --- -O1 -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-store-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts works (maybe this will give a hint on how to reduce the issue). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24716

[Bug middle-end/24716] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code generated when optimising

2005-11-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 20:39 --- A little more info, umf_analyze.i is being miscompiled. I don't know which one yet. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24716

[Bug middle-end/24716] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code generated when optimising

2005-11-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 18:49 --- (In reply to comment #0) > The error seems to be specific to powerpc; it does not happen on i386. It does fail for me on i686 with 4.1.0 20051026. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24716

[Bug middle-end/24716] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code generated when optimising

2005-11-07 Thread schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
--- Comment #1 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-07 18:42 --- Created an attachment (id=10165) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10165&action=view) Tarball with source code demonstrating the problem -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24716

[Bug middle-end/24716] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code generated when optimising

2005-11-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Summary|Wrong code generated when |[4.1 Regre