--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 00:56 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 00:55 ---
Subject: Bug 24612
Author: rth
Date: Sun Nov 6 00:55:43 2005
New Revision: 106551
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106551
Log:
PR middle-end/24612
* omp-low.c (expand_rec_input_cla
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 02:18 ---
Hum. I suppose we could just mark the variable TREE_NO_WARNING. Our
only other option is to pass by reference, and that would suppress any
legitimate warnings as well.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 08:23 ---
That testcase is IMHO invalid (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00099.html
), but
void
foo (void)
{
int i;
#pragma omp parallel sections shared (i)
{
#pragma omp section
{
i = 0;
++i
