[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 12:52 --- (In reply to comment #18) > Bootstrap of gcc-4.1-20051105 succeeded for c,c++,objc,obj-c++. > Testsuite still in progress. This is good enough to close this as fixed. Thanks. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-07 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #18 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-08 07:47 --- Bootstrap of gcc-4.1-20051105 succeeded for c,c++,objc,obj-c++. Testsuite still in progress. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24514

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-07 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #17 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-07 16:25 --- Sorry, for the delay. I had a machine fault on the weekend. So, I'm trying the snapshot from 5th of november now! Look's good so far, already in stage 2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-03 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #16 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-03 16:38 --- (In reply to comment #15) I'm trying the patch! Result will follow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24514

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 14:43 --- I think this is fixed now by: PR rtl-optimization/23585 * rtlanal.c (rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1) : Return 0 for an address that can't trap plus a constant integer, if the mode has zero size. Can

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 00:52 --- Showstopper; bootstrap failure on primary target. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 18:30 --- The RTL which is failing: (set (reg:DI 2 $2 [197]) (unspec:DI [ (mem/s/c:BLK (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 29 $sp) (const_int 8 [0x8])) [0+4 S8 A32]) (mem/s/c:QI (plus:DI (reg/f

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 18:27 --- It is failing in: 285 return offset % GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) != 0; mode is BLKmode which has a mode size of 0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24514

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 18:18 --- Oh, this effects mips-elf also which is a primary target. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 18:13 --- I'm going to make this a P2. IRIX isn't a primary platform anymore. Thanks, Eric. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread echristo at apple dot com
--- Comment #9 from echristo at apple dot com 2005-11-01 18:06 --- Bringing down to P3 and letting Mark set the priority. -- echristo at apple dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 17:44 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Changing to P1 since it's a regression that likely affects all mips (including > primary platform mips-elf). I don't know if it is allowed for someone to change the priority (except to P3

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread echristo at apple dot com
--- Comment #7 from echristo at apple dot com 2005-11-01 17:43 --- Changing to P1 since it's a regression that likely affects all mips (including primary platform mips-elf). -- echristo at apple dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Priority|P2