--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-03
15:18 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-03
15:15 ---
Subject: Bug 21858
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-03 15:15:46
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c
gcc/t
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-03
09:26 ---
Revised patch with testcase:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00243.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-01
19:40 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is this legal C?
This is not valid C but valid GNU C. The front-end should be converting the
types correctly
Please don't remove the assert, it catches things like this.
--
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-01 19:38
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:301
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:31:24PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot g
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-01
19:31 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
unsigned int dsdblm_GetBlockAddress();
void error_LocalAssert(void);
int dsdblm_CreateBlock(unsigned int address)
{
address = dsdblm_GetBlockAddress();
if (address >= (void
