[Bug middle-end/20624] wrong "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

2005-03-24 Thread oliverst at online dot de
--- Additional Comments From oliverst at online dot de 2005-03-24 17:32 --- I know, that there is a standard, but it's only a standard and any implementation can have its own bugs. And having just one STL you should run into the same bugs and not having it working fine on one operating s

[Bug middle-end/20624] wrong "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

2005-03-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 17:18 --- What option are you using as I cannot reproduce with any option I tried. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20624

[Bug middle-end/20624] wrong "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

2005-03-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 17:09 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Second why are you using STLport instead of the GCC's libstdc++? > > Because we had problems with the default GCC STL in the past, so we switched > to > STLport. We are also wo

[Bug middle-end/20624] wrong "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

2005-03-24 Thread oliverst at online dot de
--- Additional Comments From oliverst at online dot de 2005-03-24 16:54 --- > Second why are you using STLport instead of the GCC's libstdc++? Because we had problems with the default GCC STL in the past, so we switched to STLport. We are also working cross-platform (GCC for linux and M

[Bug middle-end/20624] wrong "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

2005-03-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Status|UNCONFIRMED