--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15
18:56 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01140.html
--
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14
17:49 ---
Thread with patch and discussion starts here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01041.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17340
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14
15:28 ---
OK, so we now have three proposed strategies to solve this bug.
1) Decide on doing accurate life analysis based on some function
of the number of basic blocks and the number of registers.
This limits b
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13
22:34 ---
Tree part is fixed
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |mi
