https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117329
--- Comment #6 from Oskars Putans ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> That is ok because the underlying issue is the same though. Only the line
> info for the `var = a;` assignment is there.
Could I get confirmation of Wnull-deref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117329
--- Comment #4 from Oskars Putans ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I can't reproduce the warning for Wnull-dereference but I do get a warning
> for -O2 -Warray-bounds that has the same line as what you reported.
Oh no.. It see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117329
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Oskars Putans from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > I can't reproduce the warning for Wnull-dereference but I do get a warning
> > for -O2 -Warray-bounds that has t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117329
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117329
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
By the time the warning happens, we only have line 7 in the IR left:
[/app/example.cpp:7:13] [/app/example.cpp:7:9] MEM[(struct T2 *)4B].var = 5;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117329
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can't reproduce the warning for Wnull-dereference but I do get a warning for
-O2 -Warray-bounds that has the same line as what you reported.
