https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 62064
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62064&action=edit
Current patch which does not work
I have some new ideas on how to fix this. more related to
https://gcc.gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
So even with hacking the verifiers (for now) and getting this in the
.optimized:
```
void g ()
{
[local count: 1073741824]:
f ({}); [tail call]
return;
}
```
We still get a memset and a memcpy. So t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-08-14 00:00:00 |
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
