[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond

2023-01-09 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 > > --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- > It cannot be a duplicate: this bug w

[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond

2023-01-09 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- It cannot be a duplicate: this bug was introduced much later than when PR69482 was filed! But glad the same patch seems to have fixed both, sure :-)

[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond

2023-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond

2023-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69482#c7 addresses the big issue here I think.

[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond

2023-01-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,