https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:825a47f1bb9a42df65157d4dc0a11b2c054e97cc
commit r12-9176-g825a47f1bb9a42df65157d4dc0a11b2c054e97cc
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d482b20fd346482635a770281a164a09d608b058
commit r13-6060-gd482b20fd346482635a770281a164a09d608b058
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #7)
> > I know you can't jump into a statement expression but that's not what's
> > happening here. The kernel uses thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #7)
> I know you can't jump into a statement expression but that's not what's
> happening here. The kernel uses this trick to get the current address for
> error mess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
I know you can't jump into a statement expression but that's not what's
happening here. The kernel uses this trick to get the current address for
error messages:
#define __this_address ({ __label__ __here;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
On the statement expression part, it is documented that jumping into statement
expression is not allowed too:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-12.2.0/gcc/Statement-Exprs.html#Statement-Exprs
>Jumping into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> I don't think we should be warning here at all and I have a patch to that
> effect.
I also disagree with the saying we should not be warning here. Address to
la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> This came up in kernel: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215851
> which I've reduced to
>
> void
> foo (void **failaddr)
> {
> *failaddr = ({ __la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/ocaml/oc
13 matches
Mail list logo
