[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-02-19 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-02-19 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose --- that works again with the gcc-8 branch from 20200218. LTO link times however are about three hours.

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-02-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > > I'm checking head with our GCC 8 build on armv7 which we build with > > --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-02-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > I'm checking head with our GCC 8 build on armv7 which we build with > --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a15 --with-float=hard > notably w/o --with-mode=thu

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-02-18 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- I added --enable-default-pie to my configure options, and it's still successful.

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-02-18 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at ubuntu dot com --- Comment #5 f

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-02-18 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- It worked for me with gcc-8-branch at g:9eba9635f653291804ecb832eebe1ed96e3346ba Using: ../gcc/configure --with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-float=hard --with-mode=thumb --with-build-config=boo

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-02-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- I'm checking head with our GCC 8 build on armv7 which we build with --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a15 --with-float=hard notably w/o --with-mode=thumb

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2020-01-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/91724] [8 Regression] profiled lto bootstrap fails on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2019-09-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---