https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #14 from Martin Lišk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #11)
>> > --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
>> > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-biel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #11)
> > --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
> > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
> [...]
> >> I don't see how nm would com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
[...]
>> I don't see how nm would come into play here.
>
> I thought you see the fai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 46696
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46696&action=edit
i386-pc-solaris2.11 input objects
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
> > --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> >> Good, then let me take a look.
> >
> > So I've just tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
>> Good, then let me take a look.
>
> So I've just tested current master of binutils and I can see:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
[...]
> Sorry for not getting that. Well, then please try revision before
> cc5277b173701364c10204f316db28198f2c683b
That one is fine: the testcas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
>> Possibly related to the .gnu_lto emission changes?
>
> Well, my changes are not part of any binut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Possibly related to the .gnu_lto emission changes?
Well, my changes are not part of any binutils release yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Possibly related to the .gnu_lto emission changes?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
17 matches
Mail list logo
