[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #17 from Iain Buclaw --- > The commit for it is here. > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=98eb7b2ed249537d12004f2c58583140ac25d666 I just noticed that I had a

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #17 from Iain Buclaw --- The commit for it is here. https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=98eb7b2ed249537d12004f2c58583140ac25d666

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #16 from Iain Buclaw --- Oops, apparently I mistyped the pr reference in the changelog. The real bug report is pr94240.

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #15 from Iain Buclaw --- Rainer, Unless I'm mistaken, that is the same secondary bug I raised in pr94290

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5446d0cc09e6a931065b98101d799711fd5b035 commit r10-7302-gb5446d0cc09e6a931065b98101d799711fd5b035 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Fri M

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org --- Comment

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4 CC|

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think D bugs shouldn't block the release, shouldn't this be P4?

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #8 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > Hi, > this patch triggers another confusion in ipa-devirt. > It tries to build type inheritnace graph but since D frotnend produces > only functions wit

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #7 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > Hi, > this patch triggers another confusion in ipa-devirt. > It tries to build type inheritnace graph but since D frotnend produces > only functions wit

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #6 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2) > > I am not really fluent with d. Does d have something like ODR? > If it doesn't then we need to arrange free_lang data to not consider d > types to b

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- > Hi, > this patch triggers another confusion in ipa-devirt. > It tries to build type inheritnace graph but since D frotnend produces > only functio

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 91870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Hi, this patch triggers another confusion in ipa-devirt. It tries to build type inheritnace graph but since D frotnend produces only functions with DECL_VIRTUAL but no BINFOs and other things it segfaults event

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Hi, the reason is that type "struct C264" has DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (TYPE_NAME (type)) set to which makes LTO to consider this type to be C++ type conforming ODR rule. I am not really fluent with d. Does d ha

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, lto Priori

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0