https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 10:28:39 2018
New Revision: 266974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/86004
* doc/sourcebuild.texi (lto_incremental): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
Thanks a lot for looking into this. Indeed disabling the tests is
probably good idea, so the patch looks good to me. Somewhere we should
document minimal binutils release supporting incremental link...
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
Both of our (Red Hat internal) build servers have been upgraded to Fedora 29 so
we don't see the failures anymore but they will still com up on systems with
older Binutils. Is it possible to add some sort o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
I wonder if we can close this based on fact that it only reproduces on
sufficiently old binutils and we simply can't support incremental linking on
these?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 86496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
If I recall correctly, old binutils issue warning when plugin produce IL file
which is done for incremental linking. I do not think there is a way to prevent
this message from gcc side other than requiring binu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried a couple of different versions of binutils on one system where this was
occurring and it happens with binutils 2.26 but doesn't with 2.27 (and later).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry about that. The actual complaints are about a missing plugin from the
loader. I've never seen anything like that before.
gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.log:/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccxyE8Zx.lto.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Can you please check in g++.log what kind of error you get?
Incremental linking now produce LTO objects while previously it did produce
final binary. I went through testcases where this makes difference and add
14 matches
Mail list logo
