http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
--- Comment #6 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Fixed, thanks for reporting this.
Jakub, thanks for the quick fix!
I'm intrigued by Eric's earlier comment. Is it one of the purposes of LTO so
that one could li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 5 08:46:31 2014
New Revision: 208340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/60404
* cfgexpand.c (expand_used_vars): Do not assume all SSA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Compiling with optimization and linking without it in LTO mode is one of the
most clever ideas I have seen recently so I agree that a kludge is good
enough...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
