[Bug lto/47891] GCC 4.6/4.7 LTO not worked reliable on Windows target

2012-01-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47891 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/47891] GCC 4.6/4.7 LTO not worked reliable on Windows target

2011-03-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47891 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gordon.magnusson at gmail

[Bug lto/47891] GCC 4.6/4.7 LTO not worked reliable on Windows target

2011-03-15 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47891 --- Comment #7 from Dongsheng Song 2011-03-15 08:01:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Since gcc 4.6 branched, gcc trunk and 4.6 branch both have this issue now. > > It is not a GCC bug, it's a Binutils bug. The patch >

[Bug lto/47891] GCC 4.6/4.7 LTO not worked reliable on Windows target

2011-03-14 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47891 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-03-15 06:18:47 UTC --- > Since gcc 4.6 branched, gcc trunk and 4.6 branch both have this issue now. It is not a GCC bug, it's a Binutils bug. The patch

[Bug lto/47891] GCC 4.6/4.7 LTO not worked reliable on Windows target

2011-03-14 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47891 --- Comment #5 from Dongsheng Song 2011-03-15 03:30:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > GCC 4.6.0 also generates a correct executable with `-fno-use-linker-plugin' > > option. It's a linker bug. You can try Hongjiu