http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-26
12:42:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 26 12:42:41 2010
New Revision: 167173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167173
Log:
2010-11-26 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-26
10:13:45 UTC ---
It looks like swapped arguments - fold_binary should have gone by here:
/* index +p PTR -> PTR +p index */
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg1))
&& INTEGRAL_T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-25 20:44:14
UTC ---
With testcase at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/gcc/lto/wrf.ltrans2.o.gz
I got
[...@gnu-4 build_base_lto.]$
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-spec/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-
