[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > This should be fixed now, please check. It is indeed. Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |6.0 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu May 14 11:47:19 2015 New Revision: 223194 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223194&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/66018 * acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_CHECK_FILESYS

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- It seems very intentional, not a bug. I have a patch to stop using it but I can't regenerate the configure script because of the move to automake-1.11.6

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > I think the right solution is just to stop using AC_STRUCT_DIRENT_D_TYPE > which expands to the opendir link test. > > The autoconf manual doesn't say an

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think the right solution is just to stop using AC_STRUCT_DIRENT_D_TYPE which expands to the opendir link test. The autoconf manual doesn't say anything about it doing a link test, I was only trying to fi

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-13 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- Setting LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-specs=rdimon.specs works for me for aarch64-none-elf. Is it expected that we have to use such settings for the build to succeed?

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-13 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- Looking at libstdc++'s config.log, I noticed that GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES is set because the default GCC link command fails on aarch64-none-elf and arm-none-eabi --with-mode=thumb because librdimon.a is not used

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-13 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- For aarch64-none-elf it fails during. 01:53:39 checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... no 01:53:39 checking for sys/ndir.h that defines DIR... no 01:53:39 checking for sys/dir.h that defines DIR.

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-07 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- What collect2 is looking for is configured during build, see the gcc/collect-ld script in the build directory.

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-07 Thread chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #3 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- having ld in the $(prefix)/$(triplet)/bin fixes the issue. it seems that collect2 doesn't look for $(prefix)/bin/$(triplet)-ld as before

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-06 Thread chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|