https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6257
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boostcpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #31
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6257
Jackie Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jackie.rosen at hushmail dot
com
--- Comme
--- Comment #29 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-05 13:16
---
Given the resolution of DR 456 [CD1], this is invalid, that is, the snippet can
well compile (and does, with libstdc++-v3).
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #28 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-15 18:42
---
*** Bug 38531 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #27 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-06-16 22:19 ---
I think the resolution of DR 456 (now [WP]):
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#456
means our behavior is now conforming to the amended Standard.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
--- Comment #26 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-06-16 22:07 ---
*** Bug 32371 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 23:06
---
Suspending based on the Defect report being still open.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
