https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59974
--- Comment #6 from Stephen Kitt ---
The patches were written by Jeff Epler, not me, so I can't assign copyright or
sign off.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59974
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59974
jon_y <10walls at gmail dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||10walls at gmail dot co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59974
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Kitt ---
Thanks for the quick feedback. It's not actually MinGW-w64 which is broken but
the Windows runtime library; MinGW-w64 provides its own C99-compliant
implementation of vsnprintf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59974
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
C99 says they return the number of characters that would have been written for
the return value of snprintf. Now older versions of glibc (2.0.6) are broken
the same way mingw is broken.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59974
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Kitt ---
Created attachment 31973
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31973&action=edit
Proposed patch
