http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59687
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And if you want to request __noreplace as an enhancement then please open a
separate enhancement request.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59687
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59687
Christopher Yeleighton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59687
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59687
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 10 14:30:27 2014
New Revision: 206525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206525&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59687
* doc/xml/manual/backwards_compatibility.xml
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59687
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59687
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #0)
> Also inconsistent with the table at filebuf::open that does not mention "x"
> mode to be actually used.
Oops, scratch that, I had "noreplace" in
