http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59391
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59391
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59391
--- Comment #3 from Ahmed Wafa ---
Yes, it works fine for 4.9 and 4.8.2, i can see that the fix for Bug 58437 take
care of this problem. This now can be closed, not a duplicate, but as
indirectly fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59391
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Works for me in gcc version 4.9.0 20131026 (experimental) [trunk revision
204095] (GCC)
Can you try a newer version as 4.4 is no longer supported.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59391
--- Comment #1 from Ahmed Wafa ---
// The following is shortest array that will reproduce that problem
const int int_array[] = {1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2};