[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2021-07-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- No that has never been true. The date in the URL is a clue.

[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2021-07-04 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 --- Comment #9 from Christopher Yeleighton --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > Already fixed in r12-1964 > > You know doxygen output isn't the only way to look at the code, right? I thought merged commits refresh the published d

[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2021-07-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #5) > I am no Doxygen guru but the source at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/libstdc++-api.20210701.html/ > a00209_source.html > has 2 @{ (#l00051,

[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2021-07-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Like 2371 is a comment using doxygen syntax. That comment was there in 2014 when I wrote comment 3 here.

[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2021-07-03 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Yeleighton --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > I'm not sure why the comment on the primary template doesn't show up (maybe > doxygen is only interested in a definition) and adding comments to the >

[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2021-07-03 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Yeleighton --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > It shows up in the latest docs: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/libstdc++-api.20210701.html/a03925. > html > > But several other classes do

[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2021-07-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2014-09-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCON

[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2013-08-02 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 --- Comment #2 from François Dumont --- Created attachment 30596 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30596&action=edit The modified hashtable implementation To replace hashtable.h in include/bits

[Bug libstdc++/57840] ::std ::result_of is undocumented

2013-08-02 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment