http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini ---
Done for 4.8.2 and 4.9.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Sure, I was going to do it this evening but please go ahead, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini ---
Jon, I have two spare minutes and if you don't mind I'm taking care of the
stupid change myself.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluescarni at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm think I'm just going to change the code to shut everyone up, despite it
being a nonsense warning about a non-issue, because I'm sick of these
discussions.
Fine, you win, we'll silence the stupid warnin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Matt Arsenault from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> > *** Bug 58025 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>
> They don't have to be consistent by the standa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #9 from Matt Arsenault
---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> *** Bug 58025 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
They don't have to be consistent by the standard, but the purpose of warnings
is not to strictly r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||whatmannerofburgeristhis@gm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.frey at gmx dot de
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #6 from ahansson 2013-03-16
12:01:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm happy to fix things in libstdc++ that are broken and cause real problems
> for clang users, but this is correct C++ and causes a spurious warning. Not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-16
09:40:02 UTC ---
I agree. And we discussed it already somewhere.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-16
02:22:39 UTC ---
I'm happy to fix things in libstdc++ that are broken and cause real problems
for clang users, but this is correct C++ and causes a spurious warning. Not a
bug, not worth wasti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2013-03-15
21:17:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)rd.
> However, as at least one of the most popular compilers (clang 3.2 RELEASE with
> -Wall) issues a warning for this. Thu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #2 from ahansson 2013-03-15
21:04:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> In C++, class and struct are interchangeable.
Agreed. Technically the code is ok, and in line with the language standard.
However, as at least one of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
15 matches
Mail list logo
