https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luto at kernel dot org
--- Comment #20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stick at gk2 dot sk
--- Comment #19 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yuecat0 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||galens at capaccess dot org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||snypxy at yandex dot com
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Simbaba changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andy at aligature dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's a possibility, but personally I have other things to work on.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
--- Comment #11 from Akim Demaille ---
Sorry, I didn't mean to be harsh, and I did try to propose a solution. I can
easily guess that there is no reason for it to be easy or even possible, but
can't Boost people be asked if they'd contribute?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, we're well aware of all these problems. What I don't see is anyone
proposing any useful solutions.
If someone sends a patch to remove the header *without* removing
exported symbols from libstdc++.so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
--- Comment #9 from Roger Leigh ---
It would be better if did not exist at all until functional. If I do
regular autoconf header checks, plus a check to make sure that the needed types
can be instantiated, then these all succeed despite it being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Akim Demaille changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akim.demaille at gmail dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjnxf at mailinator dot com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Balakrishnan B changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||balakrishnan.erode at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bisqwit at iki dot fi
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bisqwit at iki dot fi
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bisqwit at iki dot fi
C
20 matches
Mail list logo
